Sunday, December 1, 2013

Banned by Amazon? Here's an idea...


Your books have been removed or filtered by Amazon, the largest distributor of books in the world. This negatively impacts your sales and you are forced to try and figure out how to comply with their extremely ambiguous terms of service. After all, you are writing books about adults for adults. You’ve put warnings in your blurbs. You look at removal patterns, talk to your fellow authors and find, much to your chagrin, that there is no pattern to use as a template to guide you in your efforts to comply with these very ambiguous TOS.

Amazon will allow books that are basically instruction manuals on child abuse (Example: To Train Up A Child by Michael and Debi Pearl), erotic fiction put out by the Big Six mainstream publishers (Flowers in the Attic, works by Marquis deSade, 50 Shades of Grey, The Story of O, to name a few).

Feels like you just can’t win, right?

Not necessarily.

Think about this:

BANNED BY AMAZON!
TOO HOT FOR AMAZON!
PG-13 AMAZON VERSION. AUTHOR’S CUT AVAILABLE AT (insert other distributor)

Sound silly?

Sure it does, but guess what? Does anyone remember the controversy surrounding Catcher in the Rye, Valley of the Dolls, The Satanic Verses? Take a look at this list:


I distinctly remember the outcry surrounding Valley of the Dolls which was a huge contributor to the book’s success. After all, ban a book and suddenly everyone wants a copy. Look at the phenomenon behind 50 Shades of Grey. “Mommy porn”, “Twilight rip-off”, yep, gotta get a copy…

Your book has been banned by Amazon. Wear this as a badge of honor. After all, you are definitely in good company. But consider this…why not use that as a marketing tool?

If you are a self-published author writing erotica or erotic romance, at some point, you will encounter the Amazon banhammer for either your cover, content or both. So, what do you do?

Veteran self-published authors are changing covers or looking at new designs for their covers so that they can still be sensual but get past the Amazon censor police. Some authors are mulling the idea of modifying content of already-published stories and trying to figure out what keywords will get their books flagged so that they can avoid these same keywords and still tell the story their characters dictate.

Hollywood may have the right idea. With movies, there are the theatrical release, the director’s cut, the unrated version, extended cut, etc. Now, if you’re going to buy a movie, are you going for the theatrical version, or are you going for the one that has all or most of the stuff that ended up on the editing room floor? Yep, me too.

So, let’s apply the same idea to self-published books. The author considers two versions – one for Amazon and one for other distributors who refuse to censor content because they, like the author, believe that the characters should tell the story and not the censor police. When marketing, stress that there are two versions of the book – the PG-13 version found on Amazon and the Author’s cut/full version/over-18-only versions available at (insert name of distributors).

Look, romance and erotic romance are the largest selling genre in the world with the largest reader base in the world. Each romance reader has friends, book clubs, Facebook pages, you name it. They already pimp their favorite authors, so this just adds a little spice to the mix.

Too much trouble, you say? Not necessarily. If the self-pub industry gets on the bandwagon, this just might work. Again, the proof is in the history. Look what happens when a book is banned.

Hmmmm…

In today’s electronic age, how difficult can it be to flag portions of a manuscript to be removed/modified to upload to Amazon? After all, some authors are designing two covers and two different blurbs for their books – one for Amazon (yeah, fruit as a cover for an erotic romance) and one for other distributors (cover model eye candy – nom!).

Okay, so you don’t want to mess with two versions of your books. Understandable. So, how about a tag line: TOO HOT FOR AMAZON. TOO RACY FOR AMAZON. And after your book has been banned by Amazon: BANNED BY AMAZON. Use big, bold letters or an asterisk in the title with the notation in tiny print on the back of the cover.

Back in the day, when I was in high school and Catcher in the Rye was given as a reading assignment, I’ll never forget the parental insanity that accompanied it. Yep, you guessed it…what book did everyone in the school suddenly want to read? Valley of the Dolls? Yep, even as young as I was at the time (13 or 14) I couldn’t wait to get my hands on a copy. Story of O? I remember my BFF kept her copy under her mattress and read it by flashlight. Joy of Sex? I was an adult and still wouldn’t put that on my bookshelf; it stayed in a locked box, in a drawer in my nightstand. And my book club talked about that one in whispers. Get the picture?


If your book is banned by Amazon, I’ll definitely want to read it and so will a lot of other folks. I guess we’re either just pervy or proud that we flipped the censors the “finger”.

Friday, November 22, 2013

Fifty Years Ago Today

It was a sunny Saturday morning in a little town just outside of Tokyo, Japan. The day was just getting started. Nothing felt out of the ordinary. That would change very quickly.

Japan is 14 hours ahead of the east coast of the US, and 15 hours ahead of Dallas, Texas. On Friday, November 22, 1963, at 12:30 p.m. it was 3:30 a.m., Saturday, November 23, 1963.

I was 9 years old.

We were stationed in Japan, my father was a squadron commander at Tachikawa Air Force Base. He wasn’t at home; he was at work.

Back then, we didn’t have American TV. Our only English-speaking media was Far East Network operated by Armed Forces Radio and Television Service, AFRTS. I turned on my radio at 8:45 a.m. so that I could listen to my favorite Saturday morning radio show, Big John and Sparky due to air at 9:05. There was some program on, but the newsbreak was 9 a.m. and lasted for five minutes. I had just enough time to get my bowl of cereal, sneak it back to my bedroom and eat breakfast while listening to my show. My mom and brothers were asleep. Perfect.

I was sitting on my bed listening to the news when the announcer said something about the President being shot. I really wasn’t paying attention until then. I turned up the radio and put the cereal bowl on the desk that sat beside my bed.

The more I heard, the more scared I felt. 

The Cuban Missile Crisis had happened 13 months prior. The Cold War still raged. There was the Pacific to the east and Russia, China and North and South Korea to the west and southwest. We lived 658 miles from Vladivostok, USSR. The kids all knew something really bad was happening back home in America. The rumor mill said Russia was going to bomb the US. Our fathers were not home. Our moms were extremely cranky, and the school kept having duck and cover drills. The military bases were on extremely high alert. Yes, we were definitely on edge in a major way. When it was over, the relief was incredible, even for the children.

Now, 13 months later, someone had shot the President?? My dad wasn’t home - again - and we were NOT allowed to call his office – for any reason.

At approximately 9:30 a.m. (6:30 p.m., November 22, 1963, Dallas time) the announcement was made that the President was dead. I remember calling for my mother to wake up right away, somebody had killed the President. Where was dad? Was dad okay? Who did this?

Why did it take so long for us to hear about it?  Back then, news broadcasts and print media – AFRTS and Stars and Stripes newspaper - to military personnel were heavily censored. (The movies Good Morning, Vietnam and Full Metal Jacket weren’t far off the mark.) In addition, because of where we were stationed, the military personnel had to be in place and ready for anything to protect the bases and civilian personnel before the word got out to the dependents.

I don’t remember a whole lot about the rest of the day except that we were not allowed out to play and neither were any of our friends. The radio stayed on constantly. We did turn on the TV. This was the day of the first satellite broadcast from the US to Japan.

We cried for the President, for Jackie, and for Caroline and John-John. We were no strangers to children losing their dad. It had happened to our friends. Military children learn about the death of a parent sooner than any child ever should. We were sad that Caroline and John-John knew about that now, too.

The next days are a blur.

I do remember watching the funeral.

I remember that it was two weeks before my dad came home.


I remember the very vivid realization in my 9-year-old psyche that nothing would ever be the same again.

Monday, October 14, 2013

Amazon and Censorship - The Battle Continues


When all the crap came down about books being pulled from Amazon and other distributors, I started trying to figure out what was going on and contacted several of my geek friends. As near as we can determine the various ebook distributors are using software that scans uploaded ebooks for various terms that may indicate abusive or offensive material. 

What are these words? No one knows and no one can get answers. I know this because my geek colleagues and I have tried to get those answers.

Why can’t we get answers? Because the sysadmin or a committee will set the parameters for the search terms and this is based on their terms of service and personal opinions of what constitutes offensive material.  Subjective much?

What does that mean?  It means that any ebook containing words like “rape”, or phrases that may indicate nonconsent or dubious consent, or incestuous relationships, bondage, domination, submission, sadism, masochism, or any number of other words and phrases as determined by nebulous authorities will be pulled by the computer.

Yes, you read that right – some nameless, faceless individual guided by extremely ambiguous terms of service and guidelines, and their personal opinion inputs arbitrary words and phrases as search criteria, then turns the computer loose to pull ebooks because they have been determined to be pornography, abusive, offensive or just something a few zealots have determined is “undesirable”.

Yes, the implication is correct.  Adults are being told what they can and can’t read, even in the face of the US Constitution and the US Supreme Court rulings regarding pornography.  See the thumbnails of the cases cited here :



Keep in mind, that no one has an argument with the ruling that adults have the right to restrict what children will be able to access, but I’m talking about what ADULTS can access and purchase.

Then there is the issue of interference with a person’s livelihood since writing is, in fact, a job.

As long as we’re discussing subjective criteria for undesirable, offensive material, then I’d like an answer to this question:  Why is the Fifty Shades of Grey Trilogy still for sale?

Amazon is, without qualification/argument, the largest book distributor in the world. Where goes Amazon, so go the rest of the lemmings.  So, as an author what can you do?  As a reader, what can you do?

Authors:
Email your Amazon contact and request SPECIFIC REASONS why they have removed your book(s). Do not settle for anything less than a very detailed explanation.  In many cases, when a human takes a look at the books, they are reinstated because there was really nothing wrong in the first place.  That doesn’t help you with your lost sales during the period when the book was blocked, but at least it’ll be back up and available for sale.

UK authors:  Until your new obscenity laws are challenged through your courts, you are pretty much SOL, but I would suggest that you do the same. Email and demand a detailed explanation of why your book(s) was/were removed/blocked.

Readers:
Now, here is where the real power lies – money. Our wallets have incredible power. I personally purchase close to 1000 (one thousand – and you did read that right) books PER YEAR. I have the receipts to prove it.  And my numbers sometimes don’t even come close to some other folks’ numbers. The point is, I’m not the only one who buys up in the high hundreds of books per year. Do the math and then think about that incredible amount of revenue.

Now you understand just where the power lies, right? So how do we use it?

We sit down and email Amazon AND we write to Jeff Bezos AND we pick up the phone and call Amazon’s global headquarters:

Jeffrey Bezos, CEO
Amazon Incorporated Headquarters
410 Terry Avenue North
Seattle, Washington USA    98109

Phone:  +1-206-266-1000

If you call, you want to speak to the VP in charge of customer relations.

When you write or call, do NOT get emotional.  Talk money.  Tell them how much you spend on books per year.  Tell them about the other products you order from Amazon. Tell them that you have no problem with switching over to some other ereader because there are free apps out there for the other readers available on the market, and there is file converter software like Calibre that can convert the proprietary files. Make no bones about the fact that you will go elsewhere to purchase the other products Amazon sells.  Make the point that Amazon is NOT the only game in town and you will take your business elsewhere. Not only that, you will encourage your friends on Facebook, Twitter, MySpace and any other social networking media you use to do the same. And, oh, by the way, some of those friends out there are probably Amazon stockholders.  Jus’ sayin’…

Amazon will act like it really doesn’t make a difference to them, that they are sorry to see you go (remember, to them you are just one small fish in a big sea). The thing is, if enough people protest and boycott, Amazon will get the message and learn the same lesson just like PayPal did.

Remember:  When talking to big corporations, leave the emotion at the door or in your closet.  TALK NUMBERS. This is the only language they speak.

Speaking of numbers…Think about this:  Amazon Prime charges $79.00/year for membership. Yes, you do get a good bang for your buck.  BUT… if 10 Prime members cancel their membership, that’s lost revenue of $790.00 per year, if 1000 members cancel that’s $79,000/year.  If 100,000 members cancel because they will not sit still for this crap that is 7.9 MILLION per year in lost revenue.  Now, those numbers are not chump change to stockholders. And 100,000 possible dropped Prime memberships is not an impossible number thanks to the prevalence of various social media out there. Some of us use several social networking sites. 

One last thing, if they tell you that they are filtering results (which is what they tried to pull with me), insist that they give you instructions on how to turn off any filters. I’m still waiting on a reply to that question.

If you don’t act, one morning you’ll wake up and the zealots, corporations and lazy parents will have determined what you can and can’t read.  Is that really what you want? 

EDITED TO ADD FOLLOW-UP COMMENT:  There does seem to be a pattern after all. Attention authors:  Watch those titles.  Words like CAPTIVE, RAPE, DAUGHTER, DADDY, various animals, TAKEN, etc. will probably get your book flagged. Just remember, be sure to contact the distributor and demand a detailed explanation of why your book(s) was/were taken down.

Thursday, August 22, 2013

Freedom of Speech and Internet Bullying



  

I'm not going to bore you with a rehash of the outright asshattery taking place on the Goodreads site and the bullying, abuse, verbal assault and outright threats against authors that the site permits and, by its inaction, condones.  What I am going to do is pass on some very interesting information obtained through a day spent in research and conversation with some lawyer and law enforcement friends.

First, a disclaimer:  I am not and never have been a lawyer or member of the law enforcement community.  I have, however, been working in, with and through the internet since the old listserv days back in the 1980s. As a business owner whose company functions in today's electronic environment I have at least better than passing familiarity with certain aspects of a new field called Internet Law as it pertains to communications, intellectual property, privacy, employee relations and conduct, and yes, even how to deal with trolls. I must also have an understanding of what constitutes the difference between freedom of speech, libel and outright threats.

The Supreme Court of the United States, the ultimate legal authority in this country, has issued numerous opinions defining freedom of speech, freedom of expression, pornography, et cetera.  Here is a link for laypersons to get you started if you are so inclined:


This is a site that explains in clear, easy to understand language just what the First Amendment of the US Constitution is all about and cites caselaw on the boundaries of the Amendment.  Click on the lessons in the column to the left for more detailed information.  Take particular note of the language under the heading Clear and Present Danger.

Here is an example of free speech as guaranteed by the US Constitution and clearly defined by caselaw:

"I read this book by XXX and, frankly, the writing sucks monkey balls, the editing was atrocious and the story was a joke.  Do NOT waste your money on this book."   

I can even say that I think XXX is a stupid twit who couldn't write a complete sentence to save her life. I can post this opinion on my Facebook wall, Twitter, MySpace, any and all review sites, even have flyers printed up and distributed, and no one can arrest me for violating any law – civil or criminal.  No one can sue me for it, either.  I have a constitutional right to speak my mind. Period. End of sentence. Discussion over. Don't like what I said?  Too bad. Guess what? You don't have to read it. You don't have to allow me to publish it on your site. But you cannot prevent me from stating my opinion and publishing it in any media that permits me to post. Not in the good ole US of A.

However...and internet trolls had better sit up and take notice of what I'm about to write. If they don't, well, they can't say they weren't warned. Oh, and one other thing...Ignorance of the law is no excuse. The following will get trolls into some very serious hot water because it is NOT defined as freedom of speech under law:

"I read this book by XXX and, frankly, the writing sucks monkey balls, the editing was atrocious and the story was a joke.  Do NOT waste your money on this book. Not only that, she is a whore, a disease-ridden fuck hole that should be raped and hung by her neck until dead." 

This is an example of verbal assault and an outright death threat, which are NOT, I repeat, N.O.T. guaranteed rights under US law – federal or state. If the subject of such a post chooses to do so, they can take the evidence to their local law enforcement agency and turn it over for investigation.  And it WILL be investigated.  Again, I refer the reader to the cases of suicide that have been directly attributed to internet bullying.  These are the ones that make the news, but guess what...there are a multitude more that do NOT make the news that have led to arrests.  The landmark case was United States v. Drew in the death of Megan Meier.  Search cyberbullying, cyberharassment, cyberstalking for some interesting reads on how US courts view the type of crap that is allowed to proliferate on the Goodreads site. 

In the USA, say whatever you like about an author's book, but libel and threaten the author, don't think for a single second that screen name will protect you.  Delete your vitriol?  Once something is posted on the internet, good luck trying to gather up all the pieces.  There are screenshots out there. 

And let's not forget the site servers and your ISP.  And there is also your computer's unique identifier – it's called a MAC address. Think you're a good enough hacker to completely hide yourself? Think again.

If a cyberbullied individual chooses to do so, they can bring down a world of hurt on internet trolls.  There are three trolls on Goodreads (these are the ones who come to mind immediately) who really need to rethink some of the crap they have posted and hope to whatever god they pray to that a savvy author doesn't decide to prosecute them for their threats. 

Another little interesting fact...Regardless of Terms of Service, the site owner(s) can be held accountable for what is posted on that site.  Hellllllooooo Goodreads admins – are you listening?  

Shame on you Jeff Bezos.  You know all of this better than anyone, and you and your minions have done nothing to stop it.

Wouldn't it be interesting if all of the authors who have been libeled and threatened on the Goodreads site got together and decided to press charges?

Just a little something internet trolls need to think about. Karma ain't the only bitch in town. US courts have got it all over her and then some.





Wednesday, August 21, 2013

Goodreads Troll Society



The following post is dedicated to every author, published or yet-to-be-published, ever bashed and bullied by the Goodreads Troll Society.

Sad news today.  An aspiring author has decided to halt publication of her book because the Goodreads Troll Society has struck again. (Yes, written here as a single entity comprised of multiple individuals.)  Even though this group has NOT read the book, they decided to get their most recent jollies by flaming a first-time author before the book was even published. While bashing an author prior to publication is not unusual for this group, bashing an author to the point where the author has halted publication of their book is unusual.  I've not heard of an author halting publication as a result of GTS bullying.

"Meh", you say. "Internet trolls are a fact of life. Get over it."

"That may be," I reply. "But since when do we, the reading public, have to tolerate it to the degree that we are now going to be deprived of what could be an excellent story – and all because of the insane rants of a select group of idiots?" (Note:  Idiot as used in this post is a bona fide classification of one with an IQ of 0-20.)

This is not the first time the GTS (Goodreads Troll Society) has struck. Unfortunately, until the Goodreads site changes its Terms of Service (See Section 2, paragraphs 1 and 2), the GTS will be allowed to continue spewing their written crap.

Free speech is an absolute guarantee in the United States.  While one cannot yell "fire" in a crowded theater, one can spew whatever sewage one wishes on the internet regardless of the consequences.  As proof, I refer you, dear reader, to multiple cases of suicide directly attributed to the actions of internet bullies.  The instance of an author pulling publication of a book may not be suicide in the literal sense, but the author has basically killed a story it probably took her the better part of a year to write. 

And make no mistake, a story is as much a part of an author as an arm, leg, hand...or heart.

So, if the Goodreads admins will not stop the GTS, what can be done about this group? 

It's simple, really. 

First, learn about internet trolls and what makes them tick.  Here are a couple of good articles to get you started:



John Suler, PhD, has written an outstanding article dealing with the Online Disinhibition Effect, i.e. the psychology of the internet troll.

Second, consider using their crap against them and to your advantage.  Yes, I said use trolls to your advantage.  No, I promise I haven't lost my mind.

We all know that internet trolls have an IQ somewhere in the negative numbers, possibly even as high as 20, but not much higher than that.  This being the case, taking anything the GTS says seriously should be viewed as a joke.  It goes back to the adage, "Consider the source."  The GTS hasn't got enough brain power between all of them to light a match, never mind being able to comment intelligently on anything they review.  You know this.  I know this. But these idiots seem to think they can control public opinion.

And they can – IF WE allow THEM to do so.  Let me say that again:  The GTS can control our opinions and influence our actions IF WE ALLOW THEM TO DO SO.

Therefore, we don't allow their opinions to influence our opinions or actions in any way. In fact, IMO, the GTS condemnation should be looked upon as a badge of honor, a rite of passage.  Once an author has been  bashed by these trolls, one has paid another toll on the road to literary success.  Further, authors should consider using a GTS bashing to their advantage in marketing their books.  This accomplishes two things:

1.  It gives the troll the attention the poor, unfortunate idiot craves, and

2.  Gives the author some free publicity. 

Think about it.  Being told "no, you shouldn't" and "no, you can't" are two of the most perfect psychological hooks out there.  Tell someone "no" and what's the first thing they want to do, need to do? Yep, you guessed it.  Marketing is 9/10ths psychology, right? Well then...

Look, GTS is probably comprised of, at best, hundreds of individuals, but I would hazard not more than 500 at most. (Please, gods and goddesses, tell me there aren't more idiots than that on the site.)  There are literally millions of readers out there. 

To the readers, I say this – ignore the GTS or, even better, take their written sewage as an inducement to buy the book.  After all, do you really want an idiot telling you what to read? And since members of GTS probably can't read, are they even qualified to post a review in the first place?

To the yet-to-be-published authors, I say this – Please don't deprive the reading public of a chance to read the result of your hard work based on the drivel of idiots.  Let us judge for ourselves the quality of your writing and the story you tell.

To the published authors who have been bashed by the GTS, I say this – Use their sewage against them. Wearing a GTS bashing as a badge of honor says to your readers that you are the bigger, better person.  As a  reader, I look at a GTS bashing as an incentive to buy the bashed book and support the bashed author.  Note the psychology of "no" above. 

If power is what GTS wants, then power it will get – but not the kind it was counting on. (insert evil laughter)

Support those authors bashed by the Goodreads Troll Society – if for no other reason than to piss off the Goodreads trolls. 

Tuesday, June 25, 2013

DEMANDING AN APOLOGY FROM WOMEN ACTION & THE MEDIA





(Please note:  In the text below are several words in ALL CAPS.  This is done for emphasis only. This is being posted on other sites using software that, in some cases, does not allow particular formatting.  I am not screaming or shouting.  I promise.)

In May, WAM (Women Action and the Media) began a campaign to stamp out sexist hate speech directed at women.  In and of itself, this was a noble undertaking and has brought that egregious practice into the light of day where it belongs.  What happened after that is also egregious in the extreme and this group did nothing to stop it and, in fact, encouraged it.  The result was nothing less than a stark repeat of one of history's darkest periods.

Thanks to WAM, the BDSM community became subject to what was nothing less than an outright pogrom, even a witch hunt.  In the ensuing days this group, while claiming to be an advocate of women and a bastion of free speech, violated the First Amendment of the United States Constitution (WAM is headquartered in the US) and knowingly - dare I even say this - with malice aforethought, actively worked to libel the community on Facebook, the largest social network in the world.

When called out by the BDSM community for WAM's incredibly ignorant, prejudicial, demonizing behavior, the group then backpedaled and, depending on your definition of the word, lied to cover their tracks.  To add insult to injury, they put out a statement saying that they had no problem with "consensual" BDSM and that it was Facebook's fault for taking down the pages.  This, even in the face of screenshots of the posts and resulting responses to posts that encouraged the witch hunt against the BDSM community.

One more time to get the point across:  If it is not consensual it is not, I repeat not, BDSM.   

WAM states clearly on their Facebook page with great pride that they forced the Washington Post to change their editorial policies after their interpretation of something written in an OPINION PIECE was deemed a sexist slur about Hillary Clinton.  Freedom of speech?  Freedom of thought?  Freedom of opinion?  Yes, even writers at the Post have the right to voice their opinion in writings clearly marked as such.  Here is the link to prove that this was, in fact, an OPINION PIECE dealing with a PUBLIC FIGURE. 


After appointing themselves the equivalent of the "thought police" AND using the threat of negative PR, WAM essentially forced Facebook to depublish over 100 (yes, that number is correct) pages started by the BDSM community to entertain and educate members of the community and those curious about the lifestyle.  NONE of these pages violated Facebook policy.  All were set for adults only (18 years old and over), some were even closed and/or secret to try and prevent minors from accessing the material.  This debacle mushroomed as a DIRECT RESULT of the actions or Women Action and the Media and WAM thinks they can lie, divert and misdirect their way out of it.

Not happening on my watch.

Women Action and the Media owes the BDSM community a thorough, humble apology along with a pledge to work to help restore those BDSM pages taken down as a result of their very misdirected campaign.

I call upon members of the BDSM community to stand up and demand this apology from Women Action and the Media and insist that it be given publicly, prominently and without ambiguity on their Facebook page, website, Twitter and any other social media they utilize. 

Please feel free to share this post. 

One last parting word:
First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out--
Because I was not a Socialist.

Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out--
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out--
Because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me--and there was no one left to speak for me.
Friedrich Gustav Emil Martin Niem̦ller (14 January 1892 Р6 March 1984)

Ask yourself, if we (all of us, kink or vanilla) do not stop this now, who will WAM and other organizations of like mind come after next?

Saturday, June 22, 2013

Facebook's War Against BDSM



First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out--
Because I was not a Socialist.

 
Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out--
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.

 
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out--
Because I was not a Jew.

 
Then they came for me--and there was no one left to speak for me.
 
Friedrich Gustav Emil Martin Niem̦ller (14 January 1892 Р6 March 1984)

A group called Women, Action & the Media have started a campaign to combat violence against women.  This is outstanding in theory.  In practice, however, it is nothing less than a colossal clusterfuck.  To date, more than 90, yes 90+, pages started by members of the BDSM community have been taken down.  This does not count those taken down and then restored. 

In the interest of full disclosure, I have no doubt that the campaign has brought down some purveyors of hate speech directed at women, and that is a very good thing.  However, that same campaign has run amok and must be reined in and limits set. It has gone from a well-intentioned movement to outright censorship and violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

On June 18th at approximately 4:30 p.m. an individual who shall remain nameless placed a post on WAM's Facebook wall (it is still there as of this writing) stating that women in abusive situations were there consensually because they were too scared to escape and seek help.  I could not believe that anyone educated enough to be able to type coherent words on a keyboard could be that stupid. 

WAM's little campaign and Facebook playing right into their hands is nothing new.  "Feminists" have been at war with the BDSM community for years.  While I haven't remained silent, I haven't stood up and stated unequivocally that I won't tolerate this BS any longer. 

To use Niemöller's poem as an analogy:  I am a woman, a collared submissive and very proud member of the BDSM community.  I'll be damned if I'm going to stand in the background any longer while others in the community are censored by the largest social network in the world in what amounts to discrimination and infringement on freedom of speech. 

I said to someone recently that this campaign reminded me of the temperance movement back in the late teens, early twenties last century.  I was wrong.  It's the late 1930s all over again.

They are coming for the BDSM community.  Are you going to sit silent until they come for you?

Tuesday, June 18, 2013

Subdrop



I've read about it.  I even understand it from a medical POV.  Makes perfect sense.  Using sensation overload, take the mind and body to the limits and the endocrine system secretes massive amounts of what is basically a narcotic cocktail with all kinds of enhancers.  It's a high like no other...even better than any of the "good drugs" a doctor can prescribe.  And I got a taste of it and LOVED it.  As with any narcotic/stimulant-induced high, there is a crash, sometimes within hours, but it can also happen days later.  The higher the high, the farther down the crash.  

 No, I did NOT love what happened a few days later.  In fact, I didn't even like it. 

Going away on a long-anticipated vacation trip and having a blast.  Everyone does it.  Coming home is great, but that post-vaca letdown is crappy, to say the least.  I fully expected to have the post-vaca letdown.  My work schedule was going to be quite a challenge, so I figured the letdown would be mild at best because activity, physical and mental, is a great deterrent to depression.  Oh, how wrong I was.

Just for grins and giggles,  let's add another little factor into the mix. 

I decided to detox from caffeine about the same time.  The caffeine detox had been taking place over more than six weeks.  I wanted to detox very, very slowly because one of the side effects of stopping caffeine too quickly is severe migraine in addition to the horrible draggy feeling that comes with detoxing from any sort of stimulant – and caffeine IS a stimulant. 

I've been a coffee snob since I was about 14 years old.  In college, coffee was my very best friend.  As a young parent of two very hyperactive boys, coffee was sometimes the only thing standing between me and complete exhaustion.  In med (PA) school, I practically mainlined the stuff.  Yeah, I was a coffee addict.  No, there is no such thing as Coffee Addicts Anonymous – but there should be. 

I digress...

We got home early Sunday evening and began getting ready for the upcoming week.  It was going to be "balls to the wall" all week long.  I was ready, willing and able. 

Monday and Tuesday were not too bad.  I didn't really have time to think about anything much more than work anyway.  Sir was back in the office and going hell for leather, too.  Wednesday was a little tricky.  I was feeling irritable, but nothing out of the ordinary when I'm under pressure.  By Thursday, I was no better and it was getting hard to concentrate.  By Friday night, it was getting hard to even make a decision as simple as figuring out what to have for dinner.  Nothing was going right.  Saturday, it felt like my mind was hitting a brick wall.  Motivation was damn near in the toilet. 

Sunday morning was a disaster. I had a total meltdown and couldn't quite figure out why.  My thinking process felt like scrambled eggs look on a plate.  Everything going in every possible direction except where I wanted and needed for it to go. The clincher was screaming at Sir because he hadn't taken out the trash.  Oh, yeah.  Not good.  I felt like I was a wreck. 

It wasn't like I wasn't familiar with the feelings I was having.  I have dealt with chronic depression for the last eight years.  The problem was that I couldn't figure out why I was having what could essentially be called a full-blown flare.  It felt like it had come out of nowhere. 

Remember those light bulb moments? 

Light.  Bulb.   

Oh, crap!  Subdrop.  Made worse by caffeine withdrawal and a high-pressure work week.  A constellation of factors that culminated in the Sunday from hell. 

At this point in the story, I need to extend a very heartfelt "thank you" to Tymber Dalton, Cherise Sinclair, and Kallypso Masters. Why?  Because I suggested Sir read their books and those stories helped him recognize what was happening before I figured it out.  Between their books and "Screw the Roses..." and "The Loving Dominant", Sir understood what was happening before I figured it out and he explained it to me.

I cried a bucket of tears because I was so grateful to learn I wasn't completely losing what little mind I was sure I had left.  Definitely a good thing.  That I would have to ride it out?  Definitely a bad thing. 

Blue Bell Ice Cream, Oreos, chicken soup, massage and, of course, lots of cuddling to the rescue. 

Just like millions of subs, I began to crawl out of the very dark place and make my way back to the land of the sane.  It took a couple of days, one very understanding Sir/DH, and three good books to take my mind off this whole crappy situation.  I tuned out the world and rode the roller coaster.  Once I understood what was happening, it was just a little easier to bear.  By Wednesday, I was feeling just about back to normal.  And I made it a point to read everything I could get my hands on about preventing and/or dealing with subdrop. 

What did I learn?

  • It doesn't happen to everyone. 
  • It's manifestation is unique to each person. There are some common elements, a feeling of sadness, overall lack of motivation, lethargy, irritability, even insecurity.
  • Prevention/treatment is unique to each person. 
  • It can be worse without good aftercare. 
  • Even with good aftercare, there is no guarantee that it won't happen.
  • There haven't been scientific studies on it, so there is really no objective information; it's all pretty much anecdotal.
  • Each Dominant and submissive have to figure out what's best for them.  This takes time and patience. (Have I mentioned that patience is not one of my virtues?)
  • Bottom line:  It can happen.  It does happen.  It sucks – major.

For me personally, it left me just a bit gun shy.  Subspace is a wonderful place, make no mistake.  However, I've been battling depression for a long time and have only just gotten a real handle on it in the last two to three years.  My experience with full-blown subdrop has left me very leery about visiting that wonderful place again and, certainly, not before Sir and I figure out the best way for us to either prevent it, minimize it or, even better, not have it happen at all.

As I write this, we're still learning and we've tried not to let have a negative impact (no pun intended) on our play.  Yes, I've been able to achieve an endorphin high (just not up into the stratosphere) and Sir definitely enjoys play time.  Aftercare is amazing.  Even so, we are proceeding slowly and cautiously. 

We have found that experimentation can be a lot of fun.  

Next:  Off the cuff...

Friday, June 7, 2013

Back to the Real World




My head was somewhere in the stratosphere and at the same time, I didn't want to leave.  Real Life was 24 hours away and it was time to go home.  Mixed feelings is an understatement.  Master, Mistress, ears, and dew felt like family.  As I write this, I miss them.  I knew I was leaving a small part of me behind – just like hundreds before me.  I was sure of one thing – I was leaving a totally different person from the one who arrived.  

It was a perfect day for the drive back home.  Crystal clear, not too hot.  We would be on the road for eight hours, but rather than fight the traffic in the I-95 corridor, we took I-81 through mountains, hills, and farm, wine and horse country. 

I was still riding the high and knew my reaction time wasn't the best, so Sir made it clear that He would be doing the driving. I was good with that; I'm not a big fan of driving anyway.  (A 200 mile/day round trip commute for years will do that to a person.)  And we talked like we hadn't talked in years – about everything. 

Were our lives going to change?  How would life change?  Did we want our lives to change?   What did this mean to Him?  To me?  What did we expect from each other? 

Looking at our lives in a new context now that the puzzle had been put together, we realized that we had already been living a D/s dynamic for the most part – more than we thought.  The problem was that I had been in the Dom position.  Well, not anymore - thank goodness. Now that we had some perspective, some of the little things began to make more sense. 

Sir complained on a regular basis about the fact that I was always putting myself second to Him and His needs and wants.  Now He began to understand that I wasn't putting myself second.  I was making sure my needs were being met by seeing to it that He was cared for in all ways.  This was what made me happy. 

But, Saya, it can't always be about me.

It isn't, Sir.  When we're together it IS about you in my mind and my heart.  When we're apart, I take care of me and do what I want to do.  But, you have to understand that when I'm caring for you, serving you, I do so because it's what I want, what I need.  You really are the center of my world.  

Sir was coming to understand certain facets of my behavior and why I did some of the things I did.  Yes, I was bratting out because a firmer hand was needed.  I didn't recognize it as that, but Master picked up on it almost immediately.  Once I understood, suddenly a lot of things in our marriage began to make more sense. Why I would get so angry about having to make so many decisions in our relationship.  Why there were times when I felt so cast adrift. 

Sir confessed some of His frustrations and it became very apparent that we had been working at cross purposes almost from the beginning.  No, the practical things probably wouldn't change.  I'd still pay the bills, keep the house, do most of the cooking. (Sir admits that I'm a wizard with money as well as being the better cook.)  Sir would take care of the yard and gardens.  (I have a black thumb and He can grow all types of plants anywhere.)

The relationship dynamic was going to change and in a major way.  We were basically going to start from the ground up and rebuild.  This was going to be about us and not about what we thought was demanded by society.  No more worrying about what other people thought.  This was our life and it began right here, right now.  

Did I understand that what I wanted and how I felt was still just as important as it had always been?  Yes, I did. Did I understand that from this point forward, Sir would be making the decisions and, once made, they were final?  Yes, I did.  Then, this was the first day of the rest of our lives and, this time, we would get it right.

As the trip went on, it dawned on me that I was feeling completely different from how I'd felt on the drive up to New York.  I was calmer.  My head was quieter.  I wasn't concerned about details.  I felt like I was wrapped in a warm, fuzzy blanket. 

There was something else that was different now, too. 

When we would be coming home from a vacation trip, I would have this feeling of pressure.  It was time to start thinking about real life and all of the concerns that went with it.  Getting out of the vacation headspace and back into real life headspace - I never liked that feeling.

This time, I felt like I was ready to get back to real life.  Oh, there was a lot of work ahead; rebuilding a relationship is not simple.  I finally figured out that what I was feeling was optimism.  Sir and I had a good life and a strong, loving marriage.  I remembered thinking it really couldn't get better.

At some point during that drive back home, I began to realize it was going to get better. 

Is this what Happily Ever After feels like?  Hmmmmm...not bad...I could get used to this.

*****************************

From me to you:

Thank you, dear reader, for your kind comments and compliments.   Thank you, too, for coming along on this journey with me.  It is far from over.  If you're so inclined, stick around.  I'll be writing about everything from my job to the pitfalls of aging and its impact on BDSM play. 

Think the topic of FSoG's impact on the lifestyle has been beat to death?  Yes, I'll be talking about the book's impact on the perception of BDSM in the vanilla community.  (Some of my vanilla friends have figured out what my "necklace" is not just a necklace.)

Think life has become a bed of roses, chains and chocolate?  So, what happens when a D/s couple has a battle of wills?  It's nothing like fiction, that's for sure.

Real life, bills, vet bills, arthritis, bills, working late, too much work and not enough play, bills. 

If you  think kids' toys are expensive, you ain't seen nothin' yet...

Books, books and more books.  I'm an outspoken, voracious reader.  I'm also a literary fangirl and you know what that means...

Then, there's the vanilla world's perception that submissives are subjugated.  With apologies to Jack Nicholson (and a grin to rival his Joker):  "Just wait'll they get a load o' me..."

Real men don't beat women?  Wanna bet?

So, hang out. We do have good cookies and chocolate, and ice cream (yes, real Blue Bell Ice Cream). 

If you have questions, please feel free to ask.  I'll certainly try to answer.

More to come...um...I mean...well, no pun intended...


Next:  Subdrop